Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03789
Original file (BC 2013 03789.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03789
		
		COUNSEL:  
		
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO




APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. 



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He has carried the stigma of the UOTHC discharge for over 67 years.  The circumstances of his discharge, making a naïve statement that he disliked showering with men, and it being taken out of context by his fellow airmen as a suggestion of his sexual persuasion, resulted in his “less than honorable” discharge.  His appeal for clemency is based upon his conduct and contributions to society since his discharge.  

In support of this request, the applicant provides a letter describing the events leading up to his discharge, a brief summation of his post-service personal life and community activities, and a letter of recommendation from the mayor of his hometown. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military personnel records were apparently destroyed in the fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973.  As such, the circumstances surrounding his service could not be verified.  According to available records, the applicant initially entered the Army Air Corps on 13 Sep 43 and was furnished a UOTHC discharge on 25 Apr 45.  

On 24 Apr 14, a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).  In response, he provides an expanded statement recapping the events leading up to his discharge, and a summation of his post-service life, both personal and professional.  Also included is a supportive letter from an acquaintance of over 40 years, and a signed affidavit attesting to his crime-free life (Exhibit D). 

On 28 May 14, AFBCMR administratively closed the applicant’s application per his attorney’s request (Exhibit E).  

On 8 Sep 14, the AFBCMR received Counsel’s request to reopen the applicant’s case and, pursuant to AFBCMR’s request, provided the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) report, indicating that on the basis of the information provided, they were unable to locate an arrest record pertaining to the applicant (Exhibit F).



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  Because no discharge package was available, the circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation could not be verified; however, the presumption of regularity in the conduct of government affairs dictates that, absent evidence to the contrary, it should be presumed that the discharge was appropriate to the circumstances and was carried out in accordance with the governing regulations.   Consideration of this Board, however, is not limited to the events which precipitated the discharge.  In this respect, it may base its decision on matters of equity and clemency rather than simply on whether rules and regulations which existed at the time were followed.  Under this broader mandate, and after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances of applicant's case, we are persuaded corrective action is warranted based on clemency in the interest of justice.  After careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances of the applicant's case, the Board is persuaded that he developed into a productive member of society since leaving the service.  It is apparent he has lived a life characterized by significant contributions to society and dedicated service to his community over a many year period.  Based upon his lifetime of accomplishments, we believe the continued stigma of his UOTHC discharge is unduly harsh and no longer serves any useful purpose.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, and in view of the passage of time and his post-service adjustment, we believe upgrading the characterization of his service to general (under honorable conditions) is warranted on the basis of clemency.  While we note the applicant is requesting that his discharge be upgraded to honorable, we are not convinced the evidence presented is sufficient to do.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected to the extent indicated below.  



THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 25 April 1945 he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions), instead of under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC), and he be issued a general discharge certificate.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03789 in Executive Session on 23 Sep 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Jul 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 24 Apr 14, w/atch.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 20 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 May 14, w/atch.
	Exhibit F.  Letter, Counsel, dated 1 Jul 14, w/atch.

						







3





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03010

    Original file (BC-2004-03010.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03010 (RECON of BC-1981-02511) INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded based on clemency. A summary of the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1999-03347

    Original file (BC-1999-03347 .doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. The applicant’s UOTHC discharge may have been appropriate for the circumstances at the time. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-1999-03347 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02733

    Original file (BC-2012-02733.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02733 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The circumstances surrounding his discharge were unjust. After careful...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01606

    Original file (BC-1998-01606.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 Apr 89, the applicant was notified by the commander that he was recommending the applicant be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-50.1, for drug abuse with service characterized as general. On 6 Jul 90, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. Therefore, the Board recommends his discharge be upgraded to honorable and a majority of the Board recommends his RE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801606

    Original file (9801606.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 Apr 89, the applicant was notified by the commander that he was recommending the applicant be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-50.1, for drug abuse with service characterized as general. On 6 Jul 90, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge to honorable. Therefore, the Board recommends his discharge be upgraded to honorable and a majority of the Board recommends his RE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9901084

    Original file (9901084.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, we find that corrective action is appropriate as a matter of equity and on the basis of clemency and recommend the discharge be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit B. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR 99-01084 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00926

    Original file (BC-2010-00926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00926 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Further, although the applicant states he has been a productive member of society and has provided a letter of explanation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03619

    Original file (BC-2012-03619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03619 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 04207

    Original file (BC 2012 04207.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 7 Dec 1984, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force, with service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. On 11 Jun 2013, the applicant provided numerous post service documents for the Board’s consideration. After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice to warrant upgrading the characterization of the applicant’s discharge to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1993 | BC 1993 06022 1

    Original file (BC 1993 06022 1.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. In a new DD Form 149, dated 9 Sep 09, the applicant requests reconsideration based on clemency. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-06022 in Executive Session on 8 Jun 10, under the provisions of AFI...